17-4 PH vs 15-5 PH Stainless

15-5 PH is 17-4 PH with the chemistry trimmed and the melt cleaned up. Both are martensitic precipitation-hardening stainless steels strengthened by copper, both use the same Condition A and H900 to H1150 heat treatments, and ASTM A564 gives them the same minimum strengths in each condition. The difference is delta ferrite: 17-4 carries some, which leaves large bar and forgings with poor ductility and toughness across the grain. 15-5 has a little less chromium and a little more nickel, is ferrite-free, and is usually consumable-electrode remelted, so its transverse properties hold up in large sections.

For most industrial parts 17-4 PH is the right answer: it is cheaper, stocked everywhere, and also comes as sheet, plate, castings, MIM feedstock and printing powder. Choose 15-5 PH when the drawing calls out AMS 5659, when the part is a large forging or thick bar loaded across the grain, or when transverse toughness is tested on the cert.

17-4 PH vs 15-5 PH Stainless property comparison
Property17-4 PH15-5 PH
UNS / ASTM A564 typeS17400 / Type 630S15500 / Type XM-12
Chromium / nickel15.0-17.5% / 3.0-5.0%14.0-15.5% / 3.5-5.5%
Copper / niobium3.0-5.0% / 0.15-0.45%2.5-4.5% / 0.15-0.45%
Delta ferriteSome; stringers in large sectionsEssentially none
Usual meltAir melt (AOD); remelted grades availableConsumable-electrode remelted
Tensile / yield, H900 min1310 / 1170 MPa (190 / 170 ksi)1310 / 1170 MPa (190 / 170 ksi)
Tensile / yield, H1025 min1070 / 1000 MPa (155 / 145 ksi)1070 / 1000 MPa (155 / 145 ksi)
Hardness, H90040-47 HRC40-47 HRC
Transverse ductility and toughnessLower, especially in large bar and forgingsHigher; close to longitudinal values
Density7.8 g/cm³7.8 g/cm³
Typical usesPump shafts, valve stems, fittings, molds, fasteners, printed partsAerospace fittings, actuator and landing-gear parts, large forgings

Typical values for the stated conditions. Confirm against the mill certificate and your spec.

Decision matrix

A check marks the side with the edge on that dimension.

17-4 PH vs 15-5 PH Stainless decision matrix
Dimension17-4 PH15-5 PH
MachiningGood in Condition A or H1150; fair at H900Essentially the same as 17-4 PH
WeldingGood; weld in Condition A with ER630 filler, then re-ageGood; same procedure and filler
FormingPoor; limited bending in Condition APoor; limited bending in Condition A
StrengthSame minimums; transverse ductility and impact drop in large sections✓ Same minimums; transverse properties hold in large sections
Corrosion resistanceNear 304 in atmosphere when overaged; below 316 in chloridesAbout the same as 17-4 PH
FinishingPassivate after machining; left machined or bead blastedSame as 17-4 PH
Material cost✓ About 1.5-2x 304 bar per poundAbout 1.2-1.5x 17-4 PH per pound
Availability✓ Bar, plate, sheet, castings, MIM and printing powderMainly bar and forgings from aerospace distributors

Choose 17-4 PH when

  • Industrial shafts, valve stems, pump parts, fittings and fasteners in small to medium sections
  • Sheet, strip, plate, castings (CB7Cu-1), metal injection molded or printed parts
  • Cost and short lead time matter more than transverse toughness
  • Drawings calling out AMS 5643 or ASTM A564 Type 630

Choose 15-5 PH when

  • Aerospace parts specified to AMS 5659
  • Large forgings and thick bar that carry load across the grain
  • Parts where transverse ductility or impact toughness is tested on the cert
  • Fatigue- and impact-critical fittings, actuator rods and landing-gear parts in H1025 to H1150

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between 17-4 and 15-5 stainless?
Mainly cleanliness and structure. 15-5 PH has less chromium, a little more nickel, no delta ferrite, and is usually remelted, which gives it better ductility and toughness across the grain. Heat treatments, minimum strengths, corrosion resistance and machinability are essentially the same.
Is 15-5 PH stronger than 17-4 PH?
Not in the longitudinal direction: both have the same ASTM A564 minimums, 1170 MPa (170 ksi) yield in H900. 15-5 PH is better across the grain and in large sections, where 17-4 PH can fall short on transverse elongation and impact energy.
Can I substitute 17-4 PH for 15-5 PH?
Not without engineering approval. Going from 15-5 to 17-4 gives up transverse toughness the designer may be relying on, and aerospace drawings name the spec. Going the other way, 15-5 in place of 17-4, is usually acceptable technically, but the customer still has to agree.
Is 15-5 PH stainless magnetic?
Yes. Like 17-4 PH it is martensitic and magnetic in every condition, solution annealed or aged.

Other comparisons